| Pit Schultz on Fri, 30 Apr 1999 11:46:10 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| <nettime> Amiri Kudura Barksdale: Paranoia |
[from ctheory, the grand dame of all discourse driven maillinglists..
i thought it's relevant here, just saw the movie "PI" and before "23"...
those phenomena of viral mass psychology need besides an enemy, a minimal
kernel of info to reproduce themselves. propaganda and media war is not
just about gaining influence but spreading influencia. numerology, as
with the Y2K movement functions perfectly in generating such an epidemic
central signifier on the level of scheduling. but it also needs the
urge for a homognization of heterogenity to enter the politics of
paranoia. what do do against it? ... keeping the faith. /pit]
Paranoia
========
~Amiri Kudura Barksdale~
Paranoia is the overstrain of the mind in its synthetic capacity.
Synthesis has been convicted of untrustworthiness in the court of the
dominant natural science; it's shaky when pressed into what is
accused of being speculation. What paranoia as the most common
symptom of contemporary everyday life expresses is the tendency of
the nervous and quivering apperceptive apparatus to leap too quickly
into "intelligible worlds"; the numinous indeterminacy wherein
nothing even can be what it seems because the object is always hiding
in itself. Synthesis is out of practice. It doesn't get enough
exercise, and, in its autonomy as a part of the independent
transcendental structure of human consciousness - our within itself,
now called the unconscious - is always searching for the chance to
work out its atrophic kinks: Some stray bit of unprocessed material;
any nonhomogenized datum will do. In ~The Arrival~, an ordinary movie
wherein the main character is alleged to have been paranoid before he
discovered the government's coverup of alien activity, i.e., before
the government itself was taken over by aliens, the main character
gives in to paranoia a bit too easily, has too-refined a skill at
determining the real when on his own in the world of appearance,
especially considering that he is a natural scientist, a person
required to have an overdeveloped analytic capacity. (Synthesis is
required of us today by ideology alone, which processes the raw data
of experience before we line-assemble the Taylorized parts, some of
which data escape unmutilated into the intellectual combines of
individual theorists and paranoiacs, the infrequency of this
through-the-crack-slipping being what has left both types of mind
starvin' like marvin for the slightest bit of independent production:
The monopoly power of the ideological manufacture is what produces
this fly-by-night entrepreneurship of the mind and is the overlooked
object of the false consciousness resulting.) But this character's
uncanny independence could just be an accident. Given that he tends
toward paranoia already, the suspicion that there is more going on
than is apparent, which lurks to a greater or lesser degree in all of
us, both consciously and un-, does not take much to excite; the
confirmation of this suspicion is quite uncomfortable. Human beings
are social animals. We live in families, we intend to make ourselves
happy with other members of our species. One ancient name for the
other, homo, the most faithful descendant being l'homme, is far from
serendipitous. The film's too-easy metaphor allows it to gloss over
the real source of the paranoia of the protagonist (the movie puts
lost jobs and greenhouse-gas emissions off on aliens) and does itself
injustice by allowing him to "see for himself" too quickly: We are
not comfortable with members of our own species. They may as well be
aliens. Homo is hetero. The protocynical thought that we hurt one
another in looking for love is painful enough. The amplification of
this into the hyperesthetic notion that people hurt us even when we
choose to remain alone is almost too much to bear. The repeated
confirmation that some are out to destroy us for no good reason is
always too much to bear. This alone suffices to explain the pathetic
death of Huey Newton, and the death wishes of Martin Luther King, Jr.
and Malcolm X, who was also pathologically stoic. The suspicious
intuition strengthens us for the opposition, but it also destroys us.
It crushes us spiritually, emotionally, and most often, in the
largest numbers, physically, in the form of drug addiction and bodily
neglect, to know that we will be targeted, attacked, and killed. It
is almost as if the individual human organism, when faced with a
genuine paranoiac condition, a real conspiracy, is wired to
malfunction. Whether the malfunction comes in the form of psychosis,
outward-lashing violence, inability to believe it, or simple
stock-still standing of a deer-in-the-headlights quality, it will
come. It is one thing to resist homogenization. It is another to be
accosted by the full weight of heterogeneity. But the tidal wave is
molecular; the motion of atomic individuals is Brownian, the zenith
of difference, the apex of identity, the microscale at which they are
the same; unique flotsam bubbles equally indifferently cast about.
_____________________________________________________________________
Amiri Kudura Barksdale lives in New York City and works at
_The Nation_.
_____________________________________________________________________
* CTHEORY is an international journal of theory, technology
* and culture. Articles, interviews, and key book reviews
* in contemporary discourse are published weekly as well as
* theorisations of major "event-scenes" in the mediascape.
*
* Editors: Arthur and Marilouise Kroker
*
<...>
original header:
--- HIER BEGINNT DIE WEITERGELEITETE NACHRICHT ------------------------------
Von: ctech@alcor.concordia.ca (CTHEORY EDITORS)
Datum: 20.04.99, 11:53:08
Betreff: Event-scene 79-Paranoia
_____________________________________________________________________
CTHEORY THEORY, TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE VOL 22, NO 1-2
Event-scene 79 99/04/20 Editors: Arthur and Marilouise Kroker
_____________________________________________________________________
---
# distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: majordomo@desk.nl and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
# URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@desk.nl